INDEPENDENT RESEARCH GUIDERESEARCH EDITION 01 · OCTOBER 2026

Research guide

Understand the logic before selecting the platform.

A focused FP&A research guide to drivers, integrated statements, Excel, product economics and planning terminology.

Research reviewed 11 October 2026Independent editorial guideEvidence & open questions

A practical reading path

The terminology, made useful

Use these as working definitions. Vendors use overlapping labels; a category name alone does not establish the design or functionality of a particular platform.

FP&A — Financial Planning & Analysis

The finance function and processes for planning, budgeting, forecasting, analysis and decision support. FP&A software is a supporting category of tools.

Integrated Planning

Connecting operational assumptions, models and financial outcomes across functions. The scope and level of integration depend on the decision.

Integrated Financial Planning

A connected model of the P&L, balance sheet and cash flow. It makes profit, capital and cash consequences consistent.

CPM / EPM

Corporate / Enterprise Performance Management are overlapping umbrella categories. Product portfolios can include planning, performance analysis, reporting and consolidation.

Driver-Based Planning

Planning with explicit causal or predictive relationships between business inputs and outcomes, rather than line-item extrapolation alone.

xP&A — Extended Planning & Analysis

Applying planning and analysis across operational functions such as sales, workforce and supply chain, connected with finance.

IBP — Integrated Business Planning

An adjacent concept often rooted in demand, supply and operations planning. Its relationship to financial planning must be defined for the organization.

Three-statement planning

Linking the income statement, balance sheet and cash-flow statement. Use it when the decision needs capital and cash consequences, rather than at every input level.

Requirements before the shortlist

Editorial framework

Write the decision, time horizon, users, model boundaries and required outputs before listing features. Then document drivers, data sources, ownership, scenario behavior and controls.

A requirement should be testable: “Show how changing payment terms affects the balance sheet and cash forecast” is more useful than “supports integrated planning.”

Explore planning situations

Explore the Readiness & Requirements Sprint

Sources & research notes

The guide builds on the supplied Deep Research Report and the supplementary Loyos bi / Allevo research reviewed on 11 October 2026. The references below identify this page’s evidence. Vendor documentation establishes a stated capability; implementation fit and outcomes require separate validation. Editorial frameworks and illustrations are identified in the text.

  1. AFP: Driver-based Models and Plans ↗Professional association guidance · 5 March 2024 · Reviewed 11 October 2026
  2. AFP: Why Aren’t FP&A Teams Using the EPM Tools They Bought? ↗Professional association; 2025 benchmarking discussion · 5 May 2025 · Reviewed 11 October 2026
  3. Corporate Planning: Extended Planning & Analysis ↗Official vendor documentation · Publication/update date not stated · Reviewed 11 October 2026
  4. Lucanet: Extended Planning & Analysis ↗Official vendor documentation · Publication/update date not stated · Reviewed 11 October 2026

Help improve this research.
Send the claim, product or release, a dated source and the correction you propose.

Review or correct this research